Determined not only to have the money, JayGatsby spentyears hosting lavish parties, hoping that Daisy, the womanhe fell in love with during his years as a soldier, would attend, so he could also have the girl. Gatsby'swealth was a result of his ambition, but themansion, the car collection, the lifestyle, it was all for Daisy.
Was Daisy worthy of Gatsby? She seemed like the type of person who lived for the moment, and who wanted the excitement of love, without assuming the concomitant responsibilities. Gatsby was sincerely loving, while Daisy was sincerely materialistic. Her joculardisposition is tailored for festivity, butbeyond that, it is difficult to say she is woman of substance.
Warner Bros.
In the 1974 releaseof the film, there is onescene not includedin thisrecent release, that clearlyprovided a clue of Daisy's orientation as to what the properrelation of the poor and rich should be pertaining to marriage. " Rich girls don't marry poor boys." Did Daisy really love Gatsby? It does not seem that Daisy can love a man without factoring in his economic status.
The film did not lag. It was entertaining, and being bolstered by shimmering production,The Great Gatsby, a film based on the roaring twenties had a touch of blingwith hip-hop musicin some scenes. A little strange, but it worked somewhat. On a final note, Jay Gatsby was such an emotionally well gathered character it was difficult to feel how much he loved Daisy. I'll give it a 75. Stay tuned, movieporioum.blogspot.com.
Iron Man3 delivered humor, action, and the sacred element ofevery summer blockbuster, incandescent special effects. The film was adolescent but notpejoratively; the ominous, and serious impression portrayed in the trailer was not matched in the film. The witty and amusing humor shifted the balance of the film, and undermined the serious threat of terrorismposed by the Mandarin, who was scripted in a fashion, puritanical comic book fans will likely find questionable, although the essence of the character as it was scripted, was an allegoryfor political theater, and the creation of fabled enemies by mastermind(s) plotting in the shadows.
The action scenes were relatively mind blowing with one drawback, Tony Stark was not suited as Iron Man as often as I would have liked. Throughout the film, it seemed, there was a gradual destruction ofTony Starks as Iron Man, ever-presentfrom the first major action scene to the last. Tony Stark struggled to stay suited as Iron Man. Indeed Stark will not be suited as Iron Man all the time, but in the major action scenes, it's pleasing to see superheroes assume their heroic character in their full heroic uniforms.
Paramount Pictures
Was the thirdfilm a monumental ending to the Iron Man franchise? No, but it was satisfactory. There was enough action in the film to repel boredom, enough special effects to garner excitement out of moviegoers,and definitelymore than enough humor to attribute levity.For a blockbuster, and considering the very serious threats posed by the Mandarin, the pace of the film lacked urgency, and a story whichfeatured the Mandarinas the comic book intended would have been great. Although the trailer was a little misleading,overall it was solid. I'll give it a 75. Stay tuned movieporiumblogspot.com.
Beyond the stylish production, Oblivionfeatures solitude, artificial intelligence, and among other things, amatory clones. Jack Harper (Cruise) is stationed on a depopulated planet earth, with very little human interaction, repairing drones,while yearningfor the pleasuresof home. Was the film aiming to make a point about solitude? No. If it was,that point was not perceptible. Rather, the main character endured solitude as a conditionelemental to thestory, and the plot, in which intelligent drones, blasting with effulgent lasers were on the prowl.
Replete in the filmis the idea of advanced robotic intelligence being the nemesis of humanity, serving as a basis to suggest, more likely the film was exploring thenotion of artificial intelligence surpassinghuman intelligence, commonly referred to as thetechnological singularity.
Not onlydoes artificial intelligence surpass human intelligence, it is adroitenough to create humans, but does this mean artificial intelligencehas the right to control humans, since it created them? But is it practical or prudent, toperceive artificially intelligent beings as eligible for having rights ? In contrast, would they "care" about human rights? Essentially, the film suggests, they would not care about human rights, although they have designed humans without removing their capacity to experience feelings such as the ones customarily identified with love.
And from this arises the question, would thefeelings commonly
Universal Pictures
associated with love be recognized as less significant if they were to occur amongst clones in real life?Such a question may possibly emerge from the perception, clones are artificial, in contrast human beings areauthentic, coming into existence throughparturition;therefore, clonesare not as important because they are artificial in their humanity.
Althoughthe plot was slow to develop,Oblivion was an entertaining film, with a good story, accentuated byvisually impressive scenes, and a fractured narrative,satisfactorily explaining it all. With a production budget of $120 million, more action would have been nice. Not bad. I'll give it a 79. Stay tuned. Movieporium.blogspot.com.